How oeeco Reviews AI-Made Works
A transparent look at how oeeco thinks about reviewing AI-made games, tools, interactive pages, and experiments before they become public.
oeeco reviews submissions so the gallery can stay useful, safe, and clear. The review process is not meant to make every work look the same. It is meant to filter out unsafe links, misleading descriptions, broken pages, and projects that are not ready for public discovery.
This article explains the review mindset so creators know what to improve before submitting.
The first question is whether the link works
A reviewer should be able to open the demo URL and see the submitted work. If the link is broken, private, misleading, or unrelated to the listing, the submission cannot be published as-is.
Availability is basic, but it is also a signal of care. A creator who tests the link before submitting saves everyone time.
The second question is whether the description is honest
The title, summary, tags, and creator notes should match what the visitor actually sees. A simple prototype can be accepted if it is described honestly. An exaggerated submission creates the wrong expectation.
oeeco favors plain descriptions over inflated claims. The point is to help visitors decide what to open, not to oversell every project.
Safety comes before novelty
A project can be visually interesting and still be rejected if it creates a safety problem. Phishing-like flows, hidden downloads, deceptive redirects, copied private material, or harmful content do not belong in the gallery.
AI-assisted creation makes it easy to produce convincing interfaces quickly. That makes safety review more important, not less.
Substance matters
oeeco looks for works with a real interaction, useful output, playable loop, or thoughtful visual result. A page that only says coming soon, repeats generic text, or exists only for keywords is not a good fit.
The standard is not perfection. The standard is whether the work gives a real visitor something meaningful to try or understand.
Review can improve the public shelf
A gallery becomes more valuable when visitors trust that public works have passed a basic quality bar. Review is part of curation. It protects visitors, helps creators present their work clearly, and makes the whole site easier to browse.
As oeeco grows, the review process can become more detailed. The early goal is simple: safe links, honest metadata, and enough substance to reward a click.