Turn messy user interviews into product evidence
Paste interview notes, quotes, alternatives, and desired outcomes. The lab scores the signal, extracts themes, highlights weak evidence, and produces the next interview script.
- Paste raw notes from 1-5 similar users.
- Keep direct quotes and current workarounds.
- Use the weakest score to decide the next interview question.
Strong signal
The feedback is good enough to run a narrow validation experiment.
Build or fake the smallest result users asked for, then ask for payment or repeated use.Pain
72Founder A said they spend every launch rewriting the headline several times and still feel unsure
When did this last happen, and what did it cost you?Urgency
88Founder A said they spend every launch rewriting the headline several times and still feel unsure
Why solve this now instead of later?Payment
77They would pay $19/month if the tool showed concrete before/after fixes and saved examples
What would make this worth paying for this month?Objection
96They currently ask friends for feedback but the comments are vague
What would make you reject this even if it worked?Before showing any solution, ask them to walk through the last time the problem happened.
What specific example proves the objection clarity signal?
What have you paid for to solve this, and what budget would feel obvious?
What deadline, event, or repeated trigger makes this urgent?
Do not count compliments as validation unless they connect to recent behavior, a painful workaround, or budget.
One loud user is not a market. Look for the same trigger repeated by at least three similar users.
If payment signal is weak, ask for a paid pilot before building more features.